Fact-checking Policy
Our comprehensive verification and fact-checking process ensures accuracy in technology news reporting and analysis.
Verification First
Every claim, statistic, and piece of information in our articles goes through rigorous fact-checking before publication. We believe accuracy is the foundation of trust.
Our Fact-checking Process
Source Verification
All information is traced back to its original source. We verify the credibility and authenticity of every source before using their information.
Multiple Source Confirmation
Important claims are verified through at least two independent sources. We cross-reference information across multiple reliable outlets.
Technical Verification
For technology-specific claims, we verify information directly through official documentation, technical specifications, and hands-on testing when possible.
Expert Consultation
Complex technical claims are reviewed by technology experts, developers, and industry professionals before publication.
Final Editorial Review
All fact-checked content undergoes final editorial review to ensure accuracy, context, and appropriate sourcing before publication.
Types of Information We Verify
Product and Market Data
- Product specifications and pricing
- Market share and sales figures
- Release dates and availability
- Performance benchmarks and metrics
Technical Information
- Hardware and software specifications
- Technical capabilities and limitations
- Security features and vulnerabilities
- System requirements and compatibility
Regulatory Information
- Government policy announcements
- Regulatory agency statements
- Legal developments and court decisions
- Compliance requirements and changes
Company and Project Claims
- Partnership announcements
- Funding rounds and valuations
- Team member credentials
- Product launches and milestones
Community-sourced Information
Reddit and Social Media
While we monitor community discussions on Reddit and other platforms for story ideas and sentiment analysis, community posts are not considered primary sources.
Our Approach:
- Community insights are clearly labeled as such
- Claims from social media require independent verification
- Community sentiment is distinguished from factual reporting
- User-generated content is always attributed and contextualized
Quality Standards
What We Verify
- All numerical claims and statistics
- Direct quotes and their attribution
- Technical specifications and features
- Timeline and chronological accuracy
- Legal and regulatory information
What We Label
- Speculation and analysis as opinion
- Unverified claims with appropriate disclaimers
- Developing stories with "breaking news" context
- Community sentiment as non-factual
- Potential conflicts of interest
Reader Feedback on Accuracy
We encourage readers to help us maintain accuracy. If you spot an error or have additional information that could improve our fact-checking, please contact us:
Email: editorial
All accuracy concerns are reviewed within 24 hours.